4.7 Article

Backlund transformation, exact solutions and diverse interaction phenomena to a (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation

期刊

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
卷 108, 期 4, 页码 4181-4194

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-021-06531-y

关键词

Backlund transformation; Symbolic computation; Lump-kink solutions; Interaction behaviors; Pfaffian solutions

资金

  1. Project of National Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Postgraduates [2021YJS172]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71971015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper investigates a (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation to study features and properties of nonlinear dynamics in higher dimensions. By using the Hirota bilinear method, a bilinear Backlund transformation with six free parameters is constructed, resulting in multiple sets of solutions and new types of interaction solutions. The periodic interaction phenomenon is simulated by setting constraints to the new interaction solution expressed by polynomial-cos-cosh test function.
Under investigation in this paper is a (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation, which was proposed and analyzed to study features and properties of nonlinear dynamics in higher dimensions. Using the Hirota bilinear method, we construct a bilinear Backlund transformation, which consists of four equations and involves six free parameters. With test function method and symbolic computation, three sets of lump-kink solutions and new types of interaction solutions are derived, and figures are presented to reveal the interaction behaviors. Setting constraints to the new interaction solution via the test function expressed by polynomial-cos-cosh, we simulate the periodic interaction phenomenon. Pfaffian solutions to the (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation are obtained based on a set of linear partial differential conditions. According to our results, the diversity of solutions to the (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation is revealed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据