4.7 Article

Analysis of a new coupled hyperchaotic model and its topological types

期刊

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
卷 105, 期 2, 页码 1937-1952

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-021-06692-w

关键词

Coupled chaos; Hyperchaos; Topological structure; Chaos synchronization

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0802000]
  2. Cryptography Theoretical Research of National Cryptography Development Fund [MMJJ20170109]
  3. Key R&D Program of Hubei Province [2020BAB104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a new coupled chaotic model with a wide chaotic parameter range. By exploring dynamical behaviors with various coupling structures, it is found that the coupled model exhibits more complex and stable chaotic performance when there exists a loop in its topological structure.
In order to construct the high-dimensional discrete hyperchaotic systems systemically, this paper proposes a new coupled chaotic model. It has a wide chaotic parameter range and can relax the election of the coupling coefficient. Sufficient conditions are derived to prove the existence of Li-Yorke chaos in the proposed model. Meanwhile, the existence of hyperchaos is also demonstrated. To discern the effects of different coupling types on the chaotic dynamics more comprehensively, we further explore the dynamical behaviors with various coupling structures by using Lyapunov spectrum, bifurcation analysis, and phase portraits. We investigate the interaction relationship between coupled units and give suggestions for selecting coupling types. The results indicate that the coupled model has more complex and more stable chaotic performance when there exists a loop in its topological structure. Further, synchronization is also discussed in this work; analysis results illustrate that the proposed model cannot be suppressed to periodic points at sufficiently high coupling strengths. This paper suggests an effective method that may contribute to studying hyperchaos design and coupled chaotic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据