4.7 Article

Finite-time consensus of nonlinear multi-agent systems via impulsive time window theory: a two-stage control strategy

期刊

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
卷 105, 期 4, 页码 3285-3297

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-021-06803-7

关键词

Two-stage control (TSC); Finite-time consensus; Impulsive time window theory; Multi-agent systems (MASs)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61876200, 62072066, 62006031]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing Science and Technology Commission [cstc2019jcyj-ms-xmX0545]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the finite-time consensus problem in nonlinear multi-agent systems using impulsive time window theory and a two-stage control strategy. It introduces the concept of variable impulsive control and a switching topology scheme to enhance system stability, providing more flexibility and adaptability compared to traditional fixed impulsive theory. Two numerical simulation examples are used for theoretical analysis.
This paper concentrates on the finite-time consensus problem faced by nonlinear multi-agent systems (MASs) via impulsive time window theory with a two-stage control (TSC) strategy. The TSC strategy divides the whole control period into two parts: a variable impulsive control stage and a finite-time consensus control stage. Different from general single-stage control, TSC can dynamically adjust the time periods of impulsive control and finite-time control according to practical application requirements. Variable impulsive control is also discussed in this paper. Compared with the sampling based on traditional fixed impulsive theory, impulsive sampling in the TSC strategy occurs randomly within an impulsive time window and provides much more flexibility. In addition, a switching topology scheme is introduced in this paper to strengthen the stability of MASs. Finally, two numerical simulation examples (one leaderless case and one leader-following case) are used for the theoretical analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据