4.6 Article

Scattering of mesons in quantum simulators

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/abfc40

关键词

quantum simulation; real-time dynamics; lattice gauge theory; meson scattering

资金

  1. ERC [758329]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [758329] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cold-atom platforms are considered promising candidates for realizing quantum simulations of non-perturbative phenomena in gauge theories, allowing for S-matrix measurements of elastic and inelastic meson collisions.
Simulating real-time evolution in theories of fundamental interactions represents one of the central challenges in contemporary theoretical physics. Cold-atom platforms stand as promising candidates to realize quantum simulations of non-perturbative phenomena in gauge theories, such as vacuum decay and hadron collisions, in prohibitive conditions for direct experiments. In this work, we demonstrate that present-day quantum simulators can imitate linear particle accelerators, giving access to S-matrix measurements of elastic and inelastic meson collisions in low-dimensional abelian gauge theories. Considering for definiteness a (1 + 1)-dimensional Z(2)-lattice gauge theory realizable with Rydberg-atom arrays, we present protocols to observe and measure selected meson-meson scattering processes. We provide a benchmark theoretical study of scattering amplitudes in the regime of large fermion mass, including an exact solution valid for arbitrary coupling strength. This allows us to discuss the occurrence of inelastic scattering channels, featuring the production of new mesons with different internal structures. We present numerical simulations of realistic wavepacket collisions, which reproduce the predicted cross section peaks. This work highlights the potential of quantum simulations to give unprecedented access to real-time scattering dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据