4.6 Article

Observation of the dynamics of an ergodic quantum protocol in a photonic realization

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac15b4

关键词

deterministic chaos; quantum simulation; two-photon interference

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12025401, U1930402]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M680006, 2021T140045]
  3. National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary [K115624, K124351, 2017-1.2.1-NKP-2017-00001]
  4. Quantum Information National Laboratory of Hungary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The translated passage discusses how iterated quantum protocols with measurement-based selection can lead to deterministic chaos and ergodic evolution in evolving pure quantum states. Through a photonic experiment, two steps of an ergodic protocol were realized, demonstrating ergodicity of quantum dynamics. The analysis of noise on time evolution and tomographic reconstruction of quantum states throughout the evolution further supported the quasi-ergodic nature of the protocol.
Iterated quantum protocols with measurement-based selection lead to deterministic chaos for the evolving pure state representing an ensemble of qubits. Deterministic chaos for the pure quantum state may lead to ergodic evolution in the sense that initial states from any small area on the Bloch sphere will cover the whole sphere after a finite number of iterations. We realize two steps of an ergodic protocol in a photonic experiment, where initial qubit states are encoded in the polarization and path degrees of freedom of down-converted photons stemming from a parametric process. We numerically analyze the effect of noise on the time evolution and show that the protocol, described by a Lattes map, remains quasi-ergodic for any initial state if the initial noise is small. Tomographic reconstruction of the quantum states throughout the evolution is consistent with simulations and thus demonstrates ergodicity of the quantum dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据