4.3 Article

A mouse model of microglia-specific ablation in the embryonic central nervous system

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 54-61

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2021.06.002

关键词

Embryo; Depletion; Development; Diphtheria toxin; In utero; Macrophage

资金

  1. KAKENHI [19H03395, 19K06904]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  3. Nakatomi Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K06904, 19H03395] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Embryonic microglia were effectively depleted for several days throughout the CNS using a specific ablation system, showing its potential for studying the embryonic functions of microglia. This system was specific for microglia and did not affect CNS-associated macrophages, allowing for targeted research on the roles of microglia in CNS development.
Microglia, which migrate into the central nervous system (CNS) during the early embryonic stages, are considered to play various roles in CNS development. However, their embryonic roles are largely unknown, partly due to the lack of an effective microglial ablation system in the embryo. Here, we show a microglial ablation model by injecting diphtheria toxin (DT) into the amniotic fluid of Siglech(dtr) mice, in which the gene encoding DT receptor is knocked into the microglia-specific gene locus Siglech. We revealed that embryonic microglia were depleted for several days throughout the CNS, including some regions where microglia transiently accumulated, at any embryonic time point from embryonic day 10.5, when microglia colonize the CNS. This ablation system was specific for microglia because CNS-associated macrophages, which are a distinct population from microglia that reside in the CNS interfaces such as meninges, were unaffected. Therefore, this microglial ablation system is highly effective for studying the embryonic functions of microglia. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. and Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据