4.7 Review

A meta-analysis of hormone administration effects on cooperative behaviours: Oxytocin, vasopressin, and testosterone

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 430-443

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.033

关键词

Cooperative behaviour; Oxytocin; Vasopressin; Testosterone; Hormone administration; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [19ZDA361]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC71942002, NSFC31771238, NSFC31971025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that intranasal administration of oxytocin had a moderate positive effect size, while intranasal administration of vasopressin had a large negative effect size, and administration of testosterone had no significant impact on cooperative behaviors. Participants with mental dysfunctions were less sensitive to oxytocin and vasopressin administration, and oxytocin administration was effective in in-group situations and for initial choices.
The hormones oxytocin, vasopressin, and testosterone have been implicated in cooperative behaviours and have attracted increasing research interest for their potential to regulate human cooperation in both healthy and clinical populations. However, the behavioural effects of the administration of these hormones remain to be verified. The current analysis included 41 studies involving 3,269 participants with a narrow age range. We examined the administration effects of these hormones on cooperative behaviour and the regulatory effects of individual characteristics, hormone interventions, and task structure and context. Results revealed a moderate positive effect size of oxytocin intranasal administration, a large negative effect size of vasopressin intranasal administration, and nonsignificant effects of testosterone administration on cooperative behaviours. Participants with mental dysfunctions were less sensitive to oxytocin and vasopressin administration. Oxytocin administra-tion was effective in an in-group situation and for initial choices, corroborating a Tit-for-Tat strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据