Affective empathy in neurodegenerative disorders: The importance of measurement type

In recent years, there has been increasing attention focused on affective empathy in neurodegenerative disorders (NDs). However, prior studies have identified discrepancies not only between, but sometimes within, specific NDs. These discrepancies may reflect methodological differences in how affective empathy has been operationalized, with three quite distinct approaches to assessment possible (self-report, informant-report and performance-based). Therefore, we conducted the first meta-analytic review of affective empathy in people with NDs, that considered the potential moderating role of measurement type. Across 27 studies that included 1456 people with NDs and 832 controls, the results showed that most NDs are associated with impaired affective empathy, but that the magnitude of these difficulties differs meaningfully across disorders. However, most importantly, the results indicated that measurement type is a critical consideration in this literature, with substantive differences emerging for self- versus informant-rated measures. These results are discussed in relation to their practical implications for clinical assessment, as well as how they help to inform current theoretical understanding of affective empathic processing.

Automated summary

In recent years, attention has been focused on affective empathy in neurodegenerative disorders, with studies showing impairments in affective empathy among most NDs but differing across disorders. The critical consideration of measurement type, self-report versus informant-rated measures, has significant implications on the understanding and assessment of affective empathic processing.