4.2 Article

Stroke survivors' expectations and post-intervention perceptions of mindfulness training: A qualitative study

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 2496-2518

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1950777

关键词

Stroke; Mindfulness; Feasibility study; Qualitative research; Content analysis

资金

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand [17/522]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of providing mindfulness training to stroke survivors to reduce depression and anxiety. Results showed that most participants found MT beneficial in reducing stress and providing additional skills to cope with daily life.
Depression and anxiety are common sequelae of stroke, occurring in at least one-third of patients. This study evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of providing mindfulness training (MT) to stroke survivors with the aim of reducing depression and anxiety. Following a six-week one-on-one MT course, 17 participants were interviewed. The median age of participants was 71, and 10 participants were male. This paper focuses on participants' expectations of the MT and their views about its impact on their everyday lives. Conventional content analysis was used for coding and analysis. A single theme, Seizing rehabilitation opportunities, was captured in relation to expectations of MT, and four themes provided information relating to participants' perceived impact of the course: Calming the mind, Reduced reactivity, Remedying physical symptoms, and Not quite there yet. Most participants knew little about mindfulness before the MT and did not have specific goals in mind when volunteering to take part. The findings suggest that most participants considered MT beneficial through reducing stress and giving them additional skills to cope with their everyday lives. A tailored mindfulness intervention may be a useful adjunct to other rehabilitation therapies for stroke survivors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据