4.4 Article

Highly efficient CRISPR mutagenesis by microhomology-mediated end joining in Aspergillus fumigatus

期刊

FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 47-57

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.12.007

关键词

CRISPR mutagenesis; Microhomology; In situ tag-insertion; Multi-locus genomic mutagenesis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC81330035, NSFC31370112]
  2. Special Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20123207110012]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Filamentous fungi have a dominant nonhomologous-end joining (NHEJ) DNA repair pathway, which results in the majority of transformed progenies having random heterologous insertion mutagenesis. Thus, lack of a versatile genome-editing tool prevents us from carrying out precise genome editing to explore the mechanism of pathogenesis. Moreover, clinical isolates that have a wild-type ku80 background without any selection nutrition marker especially suffer from low homologous integration efficiency. In this study, we have established a highly efficient CRISPR mutagenesis system to carry out precise and efficient in-frame integration with or without marker insertion with approximately 95-100% accuracy via very short (approximately 35-bp) homology arms in a process referred to as microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). Based on this system, we have successfully achieved an efficient and precise integration of an exogenous GFP tag at the predicted site without marker insertion and edited a conidial melanin gene pksP and a catalytic subunit of calcineurin gene cnaA at multiple predicted sites with or without selection marker insertion. Moreover, we found that MMEJ-mediated CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis is independent of the ku80 pathway, indicating that this system can function as a powerful and versatile genome-editing tool in clinical Aspergillus isolates. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据