4.7 Editorial Material

Myasthenia Gravis Which Type of Surgery Is Best?

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 97, 期 4, 页码 E433-E435

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012339

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examines the impact of different surgical approaches on thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis patients, aiming to determine the most effective method with the lowest risk and highest benefit. Modern surgical techniques, including minimally invasive approaches with robotic assistance, have revolutionized treatment options and outcomes for MG patients. The question of which surgical approach is best for MG may seem simple but entails complex considerations and evaluations.
In their study Impact of the Surgical Approach to Thymectomy Upon Complete Stable Remission Rates in Myasthenia Gravis: A Meta-analysis,(1) Dr. Solis-Pazmino and colleagues tried to answer what sounds like a simple question: what type of surgery is best for myasthenia gravis (MG)? Most would agree that the best surgery is the one that has the most effect with the fewest complications. Another way of saying this is that the best surgery has the lowest risk with the highest benefit. Nowadays, there are many different types of surgery for MG. As technology has advanced, so have surgical approaches. Modern approaches often use minimally invasive techniques, sometimes with the aid of robots. These delicate surgeries can achieve goals that previously could only be accomplished with more invasive methods. The question asked by Dr. Solis-Pazmino et al. seems simple at first, but the path to finding the answer turns out to be complicated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据