4.4 Article

Ecological roles of saprotrophic Peronosporales (Oomycetes, Straminipila) in natural environments

期刊

FUNGAL ECOLOGY
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 77-88

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.003

关键词

Ecology; Estuarine and marine ecosystems; Freshwater; Opportunistic pathogens; Saprotrophs

资金

  1. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior) [006/2012]
  2. FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo) [2013/01409-0, 12/50222-7]
  3. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [304411/2012-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fungus-like Peronosporales are composed of several lineages of mainly biotrophic and hemibiotrophic representatives. Saprotrophic species of Peronosporales are limited to the genera Halophytophthora and Salisapilia, and to some species in Phytopythium and Phytophthora Clades 6 and 9, which inhabit terrestrial and all types of aquatic ecosystems. The recent discovery of species of Phytophthora in marine habitats and of Halophytophthora in freshwater indicated that these genera are not only morphologically but also ecologically poorly delineated. In addition, half of these genera are not monophyletic. They play key ecological roles by upgrading nutrients to higher trophic levels through colonization of plant debris, which makes substrata more palatable for detritivores or through zoospore grazing by zooplankton, although their role as saprotrophs is still largely neglected. Some species of Phytophthora can be aggressive opportunistic pathogens of riverine forests in the presence of susceptible hosts and favourable environmental conditions and, as a consequence, most studies have focused on their role as pathogens. Identification of species is challenging due to hybridization and species complexes that harbour multiple cryptic species and, therefore, is not reliable without DNA sequencing tools. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据