4.4 Article

COVID-19-related personal product shortages are associated with psychological distress in people living with gastrointestinal disorders: A cross-sectional survey

期刊

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14198

关键词

COVID-19; distress; gastrointestinal disorders; product shortages; psychological distress

资金

  1. AbbVie Canada
  2. Pfizer Canada
  3. Takeda Canada
  4. Janssen Canada
  5. AbbVie, New Zealand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found a significant relationship between product shortages and psychological distress among individuals with GI disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Issues accessing food, non-medical therapies, toilet paper, and essential medication were reported by a notable percentage of participants. Toilet paper and pain medication shortages were positively associated with distress, while food shortages were negatively associated. Moderation effects were identified for COVID-19 prevalence and fear in relation to shortages and distress.
Background The mental health response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic-related product shortages in those living with chronic gastrointestinal (GI) disorders has received little attention. We aimed to explore the association between the pandemic-related product shortages and psychological distress in people with GI disorders. Methods This online cross-sectional survey was nested within an ongoing, international, prospective study of well-being in people with GI disorders. The study was advertised in multiple countries in May-September 2020 via patient organizations and social media. The primary outcome measure was distress, evaluated by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale. We utilized linear regressions, adjusting for covariates and testing individual moderation effects. Key Results Overall, 831 people completed the survey from 27 countries, of whom 82% were female (mean age = 49 years). The most common disorders included inflammatory bowel disease (n = 322), celiac disease (n = 273), and irritable bowel syndrome (n = 260). Significant problems accessing food were reported by 19.8%, non-medical therapies by 16%, toilet paper by 10.8%, and essential medication by 8.9% of the sample (>5% pain medication). There was a positive association between toilet paper and pain medication shortages and distress, and a negative association between food shortages and distress. Significant moderation effects were identified for COVID-19 prevalence and toilet paper and food shortages, and between COVID-19 fear and pain medication shortages. Conclusions and Inferences The study documented a significant relationship between product shortages and psychological distress, which were associated with COVID-19 prevalence and fear. Strategies addressing COVID-19 fear could potentially modify the relationship between shortages and distress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据