4.7 Article

Multistability of delayed fractional-order competitive neural networks

期刊

NEURAL NETWORKS
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 325-335

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2021.03.036

关键词

Fractional-order competitive neural networks; Multistability; Attraction basins; Delays

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61936004, 61673188]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M652645]
  3. Innovation Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [61821003]
  4. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of Hubei Province of China [2017CFA005]
  5. 111 Project on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Control, China [B18024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the multistability of fractional-order competitive neural networks with time-varying delays. The equilibrium points of the networks are given by division of state space, and several sufficient conditions and criteria are proposed to ascertain the multiple stability of the networks. Additionally, the attraction basins of the stable equilibrium points are estimated, showing that they can be larger than the divided subsets.
This paper is concerned with the multistability of fractional-order competitive neural networks (FCNNs) with time-varying delays. Based on the division of state space, the equilibrium points (EPs) of FCNNs are given. Several sufficient conditions and criteria are proposed to ascertain the multiple O(t(-alpha))-stability of delayed FCNNs. The O(t(-alpha))-stability is the extension of Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional-order neural networks, which contains monostability and multistability. Moreover, the attraction basins of the stable EPs of FCNNs are estimated, which shows the attraction basins of the stable EPs can be larger than the divided subsets. These conditions and criteria supplement and improve the previous results. Finally, the results are illustrated by the simulation examples. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据