4.7 Review

Decoding disease: from genomes to networks to phenotypes

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
卷 22, 期 12, 页码 774-790

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41576-021-00389-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [U24DK100845, UGDK114907, U2CDK114886]
  2. NIH [UH3TR002158]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this Review, the authors discuss computational methods for interpreting the molecular and clinical effects of genetic variants. They focus on methods leveraging machine learning, including those that characterize the effects on wider molecular networks.
Interpreting the effects of genetic variants is key to understanding individual susceptibility to disease and designing personalized therapeutic approaches. Modern experimental technologies are enabling the generation of massive compendia of human genome sequence data and associated molecular and phenotypic traits, together with genome-scale expression, epigenomics and other functional genomic data. Integrative computational models can leverage these data to understand variant impact, elucidate the effect of dysregulated genes on biological pathways in specific disease and tissue contexts, and interpret disease risk beyond what is feasible with experiments alone. In this Review, we discuss recent developments in machine learning algorithms for genome interpretation and for integrative molecular-level modelling of cells, tissues and organs relevant to disease. More specifically, we highlight existing methods and key challenges and opportunities in identifying specific disease-causing genetic variants and linking them to molecular pathways and, ultimately, to disease phenotypes. In this Review, the authors discuss computational methods for interpreting the molecular and clinical effects of genetic variants. They focus on methods leveraging machine learning, including those that characterize the effects on wider molecular networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据