4.7 Review

Epigenome plasticity in plants

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 55-68

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41576-021-00407-y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors review the intra-individual and inter-individual plant epigenome variation during development and in response to environmental changes, stress included. They also discuss the functions of epigenome plasticity and editing technologies that will drive future research. Advancements in technologies for reading and writing epigenomic patterns are enabling a more detailed characterization and functional interrogation of plant epigenome variation.
The authors review intra-individual and inter-individual plant epigenome variation during development and in response to environmental changes, including stress. They also discuss functions of epigenome plasticity and epigenome editing technologies that will drive future research. Plant intra-individual and inter-individual variation can be determined by the epigenome, a set of covalent modifications of DNA and chromatin that can alter genome structure and activity without changes to the genome sequence. The epigenome of plant cells is plastic, that is, it can change in response to internal or external cues, such as during development or due to environmental changes, to create a memory of such events. Ongoing advances in technologies to read and write epigenomic patterns with increasing resolution, scale and precision are enabling the extent of plant epigenome variation to be more extensively characterized and functionally interrogated. In this Review, we discuss epigenome dynamics and variation within plants during development and in response to environmental changes, including stress, as well as between plants. We review known or potential functions of such plasticity and emphasize the importance of investigating the causality of epigenomic changes. Finally, we discuss emerging technologies that may underpin future research into plant epigenome plasticity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据