4.7 Article

Mass cytometry profiling of human dendritic cells in blood and tissues

期刊

NATURE PROTOCOLS
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 4855-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00599-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [DP2AR069953, R01CA219994, R01AI158808, R21AI163775, S10OD016318-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a detailed protocol for characterizing human dendritic cell populations using mass cytometry, including single-cell suspension preparation, staining, data analysis, etc., which can be completed in 2-3 days and paused conveniently. The emphasis is on enriching minor populations of immune cells using negative selection approaches.
The immune system comprises distinct functionally specialized cell populations, which can be characterized in depth by mass cytometry protein profiling. Unfortunately, the low-throughput nature of mass cytometry has made it challenging to analyze minor cell populations. This is the case for dendritic cells, which represent 0.2-2% of all immune cells in tissues and yet perform the critical task of initiating and modulating immune responses. Here, we provide an optimized step-by-step protocol for the characterization of well-known and emerging human dendritic cell populations in blood and tissues using mass cytometry. We provide detailed instructions for the generation of single-cell suspensions, sample enrichment, staining, acquisition and data analysis. We also include a barcoding option that reduces acquisition variability and allows the analysis of low numbers of dendritic cells, i.e., similar to 20,000. In contrast to other protocols, we emphasize the use of negative selection approaches to enrich for minor populations of immune cells while avoiding their activation. The entire procedure can be completed in 2-3 d and can be conveniently paused at several stages. The procedure described in this robust and reliable protocol allows the analysis of human dendritic cells in health and disease and during vaccination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据