4.7 Article

Effective high-throughput isolation of fully human antibodies targeting infectious pathogens

期刊

NATURE PROTOCOLS
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 3639-3671

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00554-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [ERC-StG639961]
  2. German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF)
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) [INV-002143]
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG) [CRC 1279, CRC 1310]
  5. COVIM: NaFoUniMedCovid19 [FKZ: 01KX2021]
  6. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-002143] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a highly efficient high-throughput protocol for isolating pathogen-specific antibodies, covering all critical steps from sample collection to antibody production within 12-14 days.
As exemplified by the ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, there is a strong demand for rapid high-throughput isolation pipelines to identify potent neutralizing antibodies for prevention and therapy of infectious diseases. However, despite substantial progress and extensive efforts, the identification and production of antigen-specific antibodies remains labor- and cost-intensive. We have advanced existing concepts to develop a highly efficient high-throughput protocol with proven application for the isolation of potent antigen-specific antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus 1, hepatitis C virus, human cytomegalovirus, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 and Ebola virus. It is based on computationally optimized multiplex primer sets (openPrimeR), which guarantee high coverage of even highly mutated immunoglobulin gene segments as well as on optimized antibody cloning and production strategies. Here, we provide the detailed protocol, which covers all critical steps from sample collection to antibody production within 12-14 d. The authors provide a highly efficient high-throughput protocol for the isolation of potent pathogen-specific antibodies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据