4.7 Article

Effect of pantoprazole to enhance activity of docetaxel against human tumour xenografts by inhibiting autophagy

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 112, 期 5, 页码 832-840

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.17

关键词

autophagy; proton pump inhibitor; drug distribution; pharmacodynamic markers; tumor microenvironment

类别

资金

  1. Komen Foundation [KG100252]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Autophagy allows recycling of cellular components and may facilitate cell survival after chemotherapy. Pantoprazole inhibits proton pumps and is reported to inhibit autophagy. Here we evaluate the effects of pantoprazole to modify cytotoxicity of the anticancer drug docetaxel, and underlying mechanisms. Methods: Effects of docetaxel pantoprazole were studied against wild-type and autophagy-deficient PC3 cells and against four human xenografts. Effects of pantoprazole on autophagy were evaluated by quantifying LC3-I, LC3-II and p62 proteins in western blots, and by fluorescent microscopy of cells transfected with RFP-GFP-LC3. The distribution of drug effects and of autophagy was quantified in tumour sections in relation to blood vessels and hypoxia by immunohistochemistry using gamma H2AX, cleaved caspase-3, Ki67 and LC3/ p62. Results: Pantoprazole increased the toxicity of docetaxel in vitro, increased docetaxel-induced expression of, gamma H2AX and cleaved caspase-3, and decreased Ki67 in tumour sections. Pantoprazole increased growth delay of four human xenografts of low, moderate and high sensitivity to docetaxel, with minimal increase in toxicity. Docetaxel led to increased autophagy throughout tumour sections. Pantoprazole inhibited autophagy, and effects of pantoprazole were reduced against genetically modified cells with decreased ability to undergo autophagy. Conclusions: Autophagy is a mechanism of resistance to docetaxel chemotherapy that may be modified by pantoprazole to improve therapeutic index.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据