4.8 Article

Transgenic mice for in vivo epigenome editing with CRISPR-based systems

期刊

NATURE METHODS
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 965-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01207-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Allen Distinguished Investigator Program through The Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group
  2. Translating Duke Health Initiative
  3. Open Philanthropy
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R33DA041878, R01DA036865, U01AI146356, UM1HG009428, UG3AR075336, R01GM115474]
  5. National Science Foundation (NSF) [EFMA-1830957]
  6. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) [HR0011-19-2-0008]
  7. Pfizer-NCBiotech Distinguished Postdoctoral Fellowship in Gene Therapy
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two conditional transgenic mouse lines based on CRISPRa and CRISPRi enable epigenome editing in vivo.
CRISPR-Cas9 technologies have dramatically increased the ease of targeting DNA sequences in the genomes of living systems. The fusion of chromatin-modifying domains to nuclease-deactivated Cas9 (dCas9) has enabled targeted epigenome editing in both cultured cells and animal models. However, delivering large dCas9 fusion proteins to target cells and tissues is an obstacle to the widespread adoption of these tools for in vivo studies. Here, we describe the generation and characterization of two conditional transgenic mouse lines for epigenome editing, Rosa26:LSL-dCas9-p300 for gene activation and Rosa26:LSL-dCas9-KRAB for gene repression. By targeting the guide RNAs to transcriptional start sites or distal enhancer elements, we demonstrate regulation of target genes and corresponding changes to epigenetic states and downstream phenotypes in the brain and liver in vivo, and in T cells and fibroblasts ex vivo. These mouse lines are convenient and valuable tools for facile, temporally controlled, and tissue-restricted epigenome editing and manipulation of gene expression in vivo. Two conditional transgenic mouse lines based on CRISPRa and CRISPRi enable epigenome editing in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据