4.5 Article

Evolutionary divergences in root system morphology, allocation, and nitrogen uptake in species from high-versus low-fertility soils

期刊

FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 129-140

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/FP15162

关键词

adaptation; plant growth strategies; specific root length; stable isotopes; N-15

资金

  1. NSF [IOS-1122842]
  2. UGA Department of Plant Biology Palfrey Small Grant
  3. Plant Biology Graduate Student Research Assistance Award
  4. UGA Centre for Undergraduate Research Opportunities
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1122842] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Root morphology and nutrient uptake processes are essential for acquisition of mineral resources from soil. However, our understanding of how root form and function have diverged across environments is limited. In this study, we addressed hypotheses of adaptive differentiation using three pairs of Helianthus species chosen as phylogenetically-independent contrasts with respect to native soil nutrients. Under controlled environmental conditions, root morphology, allocation, and nitrogen (N) uptake (using a N-15 tracer) were assessed for seedlings under both high and low N treatments. Species native to low nutrient soils (LNS) had lower total root length than those native to high nutrient soils (HNS), reflecting the slower growth rates of species from less fertile environments. Contrary to expectations, species did not consistently differ in specific root length, root tissue density, or root system plasticity, and species native to LNS had lower root : total mass ratio and higher N-15 uptake rates than species native to HNS. Overall, these evolutionary divergences provide support for adaptive differentiation among species, with repeated evolution of slow-growing root systems suited for low resource availability in LNS. However, species native to LNS maintain a high capacity for N uptake, potentially as a means of maximising nutrient acquisition from transient pulses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据