4.5 Article

Isotopic evidence for nitrogen exchange between autotrophic and heterotrophic tissues in variegated leaves

期刊

FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 298-306

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/FP15187

关键词

isotopes; labelling; metabolism; N-assimilation; Pelargonium; variegation

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [JC12-0001-01]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT140100645]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many plant species or cultivars form variegated leaves in which blades are made of green and white sectors. On the one hand, there is little photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in white tissue simply because of the lack of functional chloroplasts and thus, leaf white tissue is heterotrophic and fed by photosynthates exported by leaf green tissue. On the other hand, it has been previously shown that the white tissue is enriched in nitrogenous compounds such as amino acids and polyamines, which can, in turn, be remobilised upon nitrogen deficiency. However, the origin of organic nitrogen in leaf white tissue, including the possible requirement for N-reduction in leaf green tissue before export to white tissue, has not been examined. Here, we took advantage of isotopic methods to investigate the source of nitrogen in the white tissue. A survey of natural isotope abundance (delta N-15) and elemental composition (%N) in various variegated species shows no visible difference between white and green tissues, suggesting a common N source. However, there is a tendency for N-rich white tissue to be naturally N-15-enriched whereas in the model species Pelargonium x hortorum, white sectors are naturally N-15-depleted, indicating that changes in metabolic composition and/or N-partitioning may occur. Isotopic labelling with N-15-nitrate on illuminated leaf discs clearly shows that the white tissue assimilates little nitrogen and thus relies on nitrate reduction and metabolism in the green tissue. The N-sink represented by the white tissue is considerable, accounting for nearly 50% of total assimilated nitrate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据