4.6 Article

Marine storms in coastal tourist areas of the Canary Islands

期刊

NATURAL HAZARDS
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 1297-1325

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04879-3

关键词

Marine storm; Swell; sea; Danger; Storm Power Index (SPI); Tourism

资金

  1. Canary Government
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed marine storms occurring between 1958 and 2017 in Tenerife and Gran Canaria, highlighting the main factors influencing these storms and their impacts on the local area.
The small island areas oriented to coastal tourism are highly vulnerable to marine storms, given the fluctuation of this economic sector and the increase in its exposure due to the increasing anthropogenic presence on the coastline. In this context, the storms between 1958 and 2017 are studied here in the most important tourist enclaves of Tenerife and Gran Canaria, located in the municipalities of Arona and Adeje (SW of Tenerife) and in San Bartolome de Tirajana and Mogan (S-SW of Gran Canaria). In order to perform the analysis, wave data from State Ports (Spain) (SIMAR-44 nodes, Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda of Spain) are used. A statistical study of the phenomena can help establish a threshold for the identification of a marine storm based on a significant wave height (H-s) of 2.7 m in Arona and Adeje and 1.7 m in San Bartolome de Tirajana and Mogan. The application of this threshold identified 144 episodes in the SW of Tenerife and 154 in the S-SW of Gran Canaria. Their behavior is examined from, on the one hand, the duration, seasonality, type of waves and degree of severity that characterizes them; and, on the other, from the state of the atmosphere that concurs in its genesis by means of the Wetterzentrale synoptic maps. Finally, a first assessment of the effects of these stormy phenomena is made using local press reports on drowning, damage to urban furniture and port infrastructures and loss of sand on the beaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据