4.8 Review

p-/n-Type modulation of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides for electronic and optoelectronic devices

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 123-144

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-021-3500-2

关键词

transition metal dichalcogenides; p-/n-type modulation; doping method; electronic devices; optoelectronic devices

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61922005, U1930105]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [JQ20027]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [048000546320504]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes various strategies for p-/n-type modulation of TMDCs, including controlling intrinsic defects, doping, surface charge transfer, chemical intercalation, electrostatic modulation, and dielectric interface engineering. The mechanisms and comparisons of these strategies are analyzed, along with a discussion of their device applications in electronics and optoelectronics. Challenges and outlooks for p-/n-type modulation of TMDCs are presented for future research references.
Two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) have demonstrated a huge potential in the broad fields of optoelectronic devices, logic electronics, electronic integration, as well as neural networks. To take full advantage of TMDC characteristics and efficiently design the device structures, one of the most key processes is to control their p-In-type modulation. In this review, we summarize the p-/n-type modulation of TMDCs based on diverse strategies consisting of intrinsic defect tailoring, substitutional doping, surface charge transfer, chemical intercalation, electrostatic modulation, and dielectric interface engineering. The modulation mechanisms and comparisons of these strategies are analyzed together with a discussion of their corresponding device applications in electronics and optoelectronics. Finally, challenges and outlooks for p-/n-type modulation of TMDCs are presented to provide references for future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据