4.8 Article

Purcell-Enhanced Single Photon Source Based on a Deterministically Placed WSe2 Monolayer Quantum Dot in a Circular Bragg Grating Cavity

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 21, 期 11, 页码 4715-4720

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00978

关键词

two-dimensional materials; quantum dots; bullseyes cavities; single photons; Purcell effect

资金

  1. State of Bavaria
  2. European Research Council [679288]
  3. German Research Association [PR1749 1-1]
  4. NSF [DMR 1552220, DMR 1955889, CMMI 1933214, 1935994, 1904716]
  5. [DOE-SC0020653]
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences
  7. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1935994] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Materials Research
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1904716] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [679288] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A deterministic Purcell-enhanced single photon source has been demonstrated by integrating an atomically thin WSe2 layer with a circular Bragg grating cavity. This new generation of deterministic single photon sources features simple and low-cost production as well as intrinsic scalability, with the WSe2 emitters self-aligned and deterministically coupled to the broadband cavity.
We demonstrate a deterministic Purcell-enhanced single photon source realized by integrating an atomically thin WSe2 layer with a circular Bragg grating cavity. The cavity significantly enhances the photoluminescence from the atomically thin layer and supports single photon generation with g((2)) (0) < 0.25. We observe a consistent increase of the spontaneous emission rate for WSe2 emitters located in the center of the Bragg grating cavity. These WSe2 emitters are self-aligned and deterministically coupled to such a broadband cavity, configuring a new generation of deterministic single photon sources, characterized by their simple and low-cost production and intrinsic scalability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据