4.8 Article

High Dynamic Range Nanowire Resonators

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 21, 期 15, 页码 6617-6624

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02056

关键词

Semiconductor Nanowires; Silicon Nanowires; Nanoelectromechanical Systems (NEMS); Nanomechanical Resonators; Dynamic Range; Nonlinear Dynamics

资金

  1. ERC CoG Grant [681275]
  2. Spanish Science, Innovation and Universities Ministry [PGC2018-101762-B-I00, TEC2017-89765R]
  3. Fundacion General CSIC through the ComFuturo program
  4. Comunidad de Madrid [S2018/NMT-4291 TEC2SPACE]
  5. MINECO [CSIC13-4E-1794]
  6. FEDER, FSE
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [681275] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamic range quantifies the linear operation regime available in nanomechanical resonators. Nonlinearities can affect the response of nanowire resonators, but it is possible to achieve high values, up to 90 dB, through certain techniques.
Dynamic range quantifies the linear operation regime available in nanomechanical resonators. Nonlinearities dominate the response of flexural beams in the limit of very high aspect ratio and very small diameter, which leads to expectation of low dynamic range for nanowire resonators in general. However, the highest achievable dynamic range for nanowire resonators with practical dimensions remains to be determined. We report dynamic range measurements on singly clamped silicon nanowire resonators reaching remarkably high values of up to 90 dB obtained with a simple harmonic actuation scheme. We explain these measurements by a comprehensive theoretical examination of dynamic range in singly clamped flexural beams including the effect of tapering, a usual feature of semiconductor nanowires. Our analysis reveals the nanowire characteristics required for broad linear operation, and given the relationship between dynamic range and mass sensing performance, it also enables analytical determination of mass detection limits, reaching atomic-scale resolution for feasible nanowires.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据