4.6 Article

Augmented reality situated visualization in decision-making

期刊

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
卷 81, 期 11, 页码 14749-14772

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-021-10971-4

关键词

Decision-making; Augmented reality; Situated visualization

资金

  1. IEETA - Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro - FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology [UID/CEC/00127/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces the application of situated visualization through augmented reality in decision support systems, discusses the relevant concepts, application areas, benefits, challenges, and opportunities, and proposes guidelines for the design and implementation of DSS based on situated augmented reality.
Decision-making processes and decision support systems (DSS) have been improved by a variety of methods originated from several scientific fields, such as information science and artificial intelligence (AI). Situated visualization (SV) allows presenting visual data representations in context and may support better DSS. Its main characteristic is to display data representations near the data referent. As augmented reality (AR) is becoming more mature, affordable, and widespread, using it as a tool for SV becomes viable in several situations. Moreover, it may provide a positive contribution to more effective and efficient decision-making, as the users have contextual, relevant, and appropriate information that fosters more informed choices. As new challenges and opportunities arise, it is important to understand the relevance of intertwining these fields. Based on literature analysis, this paper introduces the main concepts involved, and, through practical examples, addresses and discusses current areas of application, benefits, challenges, and opportunities of using SV through AR to visualize data in context to support better decision-making processes. In the end, a set of guidelines for the design and implementation of DSS based on situated augmented reality are proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据