4.7 Article

Seeds don't sink: even massive black hole 'seeds' cannot migrate to galaxy centres efficiently

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2713

关键词

black hole physics; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics

资金

  1. NSF CAREER grant [1455342]
  2. NASA [80NSSC18K0562, 17-ATP17-0067, HST-AR-15800.001-A]
  3. NSF [AST-2009687, AST-1715216, AST-1652522, 1911233, 20009234]
  4. Flatiron Institute - Simons Foundation
  5. Cottrell Scholar Award from the Research Corporation for Science Advancement
  6. Scialog Award from the Research Corporation for Science Advancement
  7. NASA HEC [SMD-16-7592]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supermassive black holes in the early universe may not efficiently sink in high-z galaxies, but solutions such as increasing the number of seeds or embedding seed BHs in dense structures can be considered.
Possible formation scenarios of supermassive black holes (BHs) in the early universe include rapid growth from less massive seed BHs via super-Eddington accretion or runaway mergers, yet both of these scenarios would require seed Blis to efficiently sink to and be trapped in the Galactic Centre via dynamical friction. This may not be true for their complicated dynamics in clumpy high-z galaxies. In this work, we study this 'sinking problem' with state-of-the-art high-resolution cosmological simulations, combined with both direct N-body integration of seed BH trajectories and post-processing of randomly generated test particles with a newly developed dynamical friction estimator. We find that seed BHs less massive than 10(8) M-circle dot (i.e. all but the already-supermassive seeds) cannot efficiently sink in typical high-z galaxies. We also discuss two possible solutions: dramatically increasing the number of seeds such that one seed can end up trapped in the Galactic Centre by chance, or seed BHs being embedded in dense structures (e.g. star clusters) with effective masses above the mass threshold. We discuss the limitations of both solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据