4.7 Article

The BACCO simulation project: a baryonification emulator with neural networks

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1911

关键词

methods: numerical; cosmological parameters; large-scale structure of Universe

资金

  1. European Research Council [716151]
  2. 'Juan de la Cierva Formacion' fellowship [FJCI-2017-33816]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a neural network emulator for baryonic effects in the non-linear matter power spectrum. By calibrating the emulator in a wide parameter space, the precision of the emulator is estimated to be 2-3% at specific scales and redshift ranges. Through comparison with various cosmological simulations, the accuracy of the emulator is validated.
We present a neural network emulator for baryonic effects in the non-linear matter power spectrum. We calibrate this emulator using more than 50 000 measurements in a 15D parameter space, varying cosmology and baryonic physics. Baryonic physics is described through a baryonification algorithm, which has been shown to accurately capture the relevant effects on the power spectrum and bispectrum in state-of-the-art hydrodynamical simulations. Cosmological parameters are sampled using a cosmology-rescaling approach including massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy. The specific quantity we emulate is the ratio between matter power spectrum with baryons and gravity only, and we estimate the overall precision of the emulator to be 2-3 per cent, at scales k < 5 h Mpc(-1) and redshifts 0 < z < 1.5. We obtain an accuracy of 1-2 per cent, when testing the emulator against a collection of 74 different cosmological hydrodynamical simulations and their respective gravity-only counterparts. We also show that only one baryonic parameter, namely Mc, which sets the gas fraction retained per halo mass, is enough to have accurate predictions of most of the baryonic feedbacks at a given epoch. Our emulator is publicly available at http://www.dipc.org/bacco.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据