4.7 Article

Dynamical stability in the vicinity of Saturnian small moons: the cases of Aegaeon, Methone, Anthe, and Pallene

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1733

关键词

planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability; planetary systems

资金

  1. Fapesp [2020/06807-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work examines the orbital evolution and dynamical stability near the small Saturnian moons Aegaeon, Methone, Anthe, and Pallene. Results show that for massless small moons, orbiting particles remain stable for at least 10(4) yr, while massive bodies cause significant perturbations and destabilization of particle orbits. Initial arcs around the moons are eroded within hundreds of years, providing insights into gravitational forces' time-scales for removing particles.
In this work we analyse the orbital evolution and dynamical stability in the vicinity of the small Saturnian moons Aegaeon, Methone, Anthe, and Pallene. We numerically resolve the exact equations of motions to investigate the orbital motion of thousands of test particles within and near the domain of the 7/6, 14/15, 10/11 mean-motion resonances of Aegaeon, Methone, and Anthe with Mimas, respectively. We show that, for massless small moons, the orbits of particles initially restricted to the resonant domains remain stable for at least 10(4) yr. We also conduct numerical simulations considering Aegaeon, Methone, Anthe, and Pallene as massive bodies. The results show that most particles undergo significant perturbations in their orbital motions, ultimately destabilizing on time-scales of a few hundreds of years or even less through collisions with the four small moons. In addition, we also simulate the orbital evolution of test particles initially distributed in the form of arcs around Aegaeon, Methone, and Anthe. We show that the initial arcs are dynamically eroded on time-scales of hundreds of years, allowing us to constrain the time-scales on which gravitational forces operate to remove particles from the observed arcs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据