4.6 Review

Fluorescent Immunoassays for Detection and Quantification of Cardiac Troponin I: A Short Review

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26164812

关键词

cardiac troponin; myocardial infarction; immunoassays; fluorescence; biosensors; cardiovascular diseases

资金

  1. American University of Sharjah, UAE [BBRI18-CAS-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiovascular diseases are a major cause of global human death, with myocardial infarction (MI) having the highest morbidity and mortality rates. Cardiac troponin is considered the gold standard as a specific biomarker for cardiac injury, with fluorescence-based immunoassays being the fastest, most accurate, and most sensitive method for detecting cardiac troponins post-MI.
Cardiovascular diseases are considered one of the major causes of human death globally. Myocardial infarction (MI), characterized by a diminished flow of blood to the heart, presents the highest rate of morbidity and mortality among all other cardiovascular diseases. These fatal effects have triggered the need for early diagnosis of appropriate biomarkers so that countermeasures can be taken. Cardiac troponin, the central key element of muscle regulation and contraction, is the most specific biomarker for cardiac injury and is considered the gold standard. Due to its high specificity, the measurement of cardiac troponin levels has become the predominant indicator of MI. Various forms of diagnostic methods have been developed so far, including chemiluminescence, fluorescence immunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, surface plasmon resonance, electrical detection, and colorimetric protein assays. However, fluorescence-based immunoassays are considered fast, accurate and most sensitive of all in the determination of cardiac troponins post-MI. This review represents the strategies, methods and levels of detection involved in the reported fluorescence-based immunoassays for the detection of cardiac troponin I.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据