4.6 Article

Experimental and Theoretical Insights on Methylene Blue Removal from Wastewater Using an Adsorbent Obtained from the Residues of the Orange Industry

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26154555

关键词

adsorption; dyes; orange peel; adsorption mechanism; DFT

资金

  1. Universidad de Medellin
  2. CONACyT, Mexico [CB-2019-01-285309]
  3. MINCIENCIAS COLOMBIA [120677757983, CT-648-2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that chemically treated orange peel materials have great potential for removing methylene blue from aqueous solutions, with the main adsorption mechanisms being electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and pi-pi interactions.
Chemical and thermochemical transformations were performed on orange peel to obtain materials that were characterized and further tested to explore their potential as adsorbents for the removal of methylene blue (MB) from aqueous solutions. The results show the high potential of some of these materials for MB adsorption not only due to the surface area of the resulting substrate but also to the chemistry of the corresponding surface functional groups. Fitting of the kinetic as well as the equilibrium experimental data to different models suggests that a variety of interactions are involved in MB adsorption. The overall capacities for these substrates (larger than 192.31 mg g(-1)) were found to compare well with those reported for activated carbon and other adsorbents of agro-industrial origin. According to these results and complementary with theoretical study using Density Functional Theory (DFT) approximations, it was found that the most important adsorption mechanisms of MB correspond to: (i) electrostatic interactions, (ii) H-bonding, and (iii) pi (MB)-pi (biochar) interactions. In view of these findings, it can be concluded that adsorbent materials obtained from orange peel, constitute a good alternative for the removal of MB dye from aqueous solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据