4.6 Article

Analysis of Cannabinoids and Metabolites in Dried Urine Spots (DUS)

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26175334

关键词

dried urine spots; cannabinoids; THC; THCCOOH; THCCOOH-gluc; LC-MS; MS

资金

  1. MDPI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric procedure was developed and validated for the detection and quantitative determination of cannabinoids and metabolites in dried urine spots (DUS). The method fulfilled validation parameters for both DUS and urine. DUS seems to provide a good alternative storage condition for urine that should be checked for the presence of cannabinoids and metabolites.
Dried urine spots (DUS) represent a potential alternative sample storage for forensic toxicological analysis. The aim of the current study was to develop and validate a liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric procedure for the detection and quantitative determination of cannabinoids and metabolites in DUS. A two-step extraction was performed on DUS and urine samples. An LC-MS/MS system was operated in multiple reaction monitoring and positive polarization mode. The method was checked for sensitivity, specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, recovery, matrix effects and carryover. The method was applied to 70 urine samples collected from healthy volunteers and drug addicts undergoing withdrawal treatment. The method was successfully developed for DUS. LODs lower than 2.0 ng/mL were obtained for all the monitored substances. All the validation parameters fulfilled the acceptance criteria either for DUS or urine. Among the real samples, 45 cases provided positive results for at least one compound. A good quali-quantitative agreement was obtained between DUS and urine. A good stability of THC, THCCOOH and THCCOOH-gluc was observed after a 24 h storage, in contrast to previously published results. DUS seems to provide a good alternative storage condition for urine that should be checked for the presence of cannabinoids and metabolites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据