4.6 Article

Third Generation Buchwald Precatalysts with XPhos and RuPhos: Multigram Scale Synthesis, Solvent-Dependent Isomerization of XPhos Pd G3 and Quality Control by 1H- and 31P-NMR Spectroscopy

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26123507

关键词

palladium; Buchwald precatalysts; NMR spectroscopy; quality control

资金

  1. Ministry of Education & Science of Ukraine [0120U102179]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study prepared third generation Buchwald precatalysts in multigram scale by a modified procedure and analyzed the structures of complexes and impurities using NMR. The solvent-dependent isomerization of a specific precatalyst was studied by NMR, and impurities were identified and characterized using single crystal X-ray diffraction. A simple method for quick quality control of the precatalysts based on H-1-NMR spectra analysis was proposed.
The third generation Buchwald precatalysts Pd(ABP)(Phos)(OMs) (also known as Phos Pd G3)) with XPhos and RuPhos were prepared in multigram scale by a modified procedure (ABP = fragment of C-deprotonated 2-aminobiphenyl, XPhos = 2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2 ',4 ',6 '-triisopropylbiphenyl, RuPhos = 2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2 ',6 '-diisopropoxybiphenyl, OMs- = CH3SO3-). The H-1- and P-31-NMR spectra of the title complexes and some impurities, measured by various 1D and 2D techniques, were analyzed in detail. The solvent-dependent isomerization of Pd(ABP)(XPhos)(OMs) was studied by NMR, and the X-ray structures of two isomers were determined. The impurities in precatalysts, such as Pd(ABP)(HABP)(OMs) (HABP-neutral 2-aminobiphenyl coordinated to Pd2+ in N-monodentate mode) and PdCl2(XPhos)(2), were identified and characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. A simple method for the quick quality control (QC) of the precatalysts, suitable for routine use, was proposed. The method was based on the assessment of the impurity content on the basis of the H-1-NMR spectra analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据