4.6 Article

Spruce Bark-Extracted Lignin and Tannin-Based Bioresin-Adhesives: Effect of Curing Temperatures on the Thermal Properties of the Resins

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26123523

关键词

bioresin adhesive; lignin; wood panel; cross-linking; curing; thermogravimetric analysis

资金

  1. VINNOVA-Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems under the BioInnovation Program [2018-03995]
  2. Vinnova [2018-03995] Funding Source: Vinnova

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Formaldehyde-free bioresin adhesives were synthesized from lignin and tannin extracted from softwood bark, using glyoxal as a substitute for formaldehyde to modify the chemical structure. The glyoxal modification reaction was confirmed by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, and the thermal properties were assessed by DSC and TGA. High temperature-cured bioresins showed higher thermal stability and degree of cross-linking, influenced by resin compositions and curing temperatures.
In this study, formaldehyde-free bioresin adhesives were synthesised from lignin and tannin, which were obtained from softwood bark. The extraction was done via organosolv treatment and hot water extraction, respectively. A non-volatile, non-toxic aldehyde, glyoxal, was used as a substitute for formaldehyde in order to modify the chemical structure of both the lignin and tannin. The glyoxal modification reaction was confirmed by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Three different resin formulations were prepared using modified lignin along with the modified tannin. The thermal properties of the modified lignin, tannin, and the bioresins were assessed by DSC and TGA. When the bioresins were cured at a high temperature (200 degrees C) by compression moulding, they exhibited higher thermal stability as well as an enhanced degree of cross-linking compared to the low temperature-cured bioresins. The thermal properties of the resins were strongly affected by the compositions of the resins as well as the curing temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据