4.6 Review

Ebselen and Analogues: Pharmacological Properties and Synthetic Strategies for Their Preparation

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26144230

关键词

ebselen; selenorganic compounds; antiviral; bipolar disorders; hearing loss; selenium chemistry

资金

  1. Universita degli studi di Perugia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ebselen, the leader of selenorganic compounds, has been identified as a mimetic of the key antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase and is currently undergoing clinical evaluation for treating COVID-19 patients. Despite its lack of specificity in vitro, Ebselen has shown good tolerance in vivo with no signs of toxicity at administered doses. Additionally, there is a lack of review articles on synthetic approaches for the construction of the benzo[d][1,2]-selenazol-3(2H)-one scaffold, a topic which is addressed in this review.
Ebselen is the leader of selenorganic compounds, and starting from its identification as mimetic of the key antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase, several papers have appeared in literature claiming its biological activities. It was the subject of several clinical trials and it is currently in clinical evaluation for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Given our interest in the synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of selenorganic derivatives with this review, we aimed to collect all the papers focused on the biological evaluation of ebselen and its close analogues, covering the timeline between 2016 and most of 2021. Our analysis evidences that, even if it lacks specificity when tested in vitro, being able to bind to every reactive cysteine, it proved to be always well tolerated in vivo, exerting no sign of toxicity whatever the administered doses. Besides, looking at the literature, we realized that no review article dealing with the synthetic approaches for the construction of the benzo[d][1,2]-selenazol-3(2H)-one scaffold is available; thus, a section of the present review article is completely devoted to this specific topic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据