4.6 Article

The Structural and Dynamical Properties of the Hydration of SNase Based on a Molecular Dynamics Simulation

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26175403

关键词

structural fluctuations; hydration water; protein dynamics transition; mutation; hydrogen bond

资金

  1. Foundation of Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedical Functional Materials [17KJD150004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the dynamics of protein-water change at different temperatures and mutation levels affect protein's amplitude fluctuations and hydrogen bond loss. The results also suggest that protein activation is related to the hydrogen bonding between local hydration water and the protein as well as other waters.
The dynamics of protein-water fluctuations are of biological significance. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed in order to explore the hydration dynamics of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) at different temperatures and mutation levels. A dynamical transition in hydration water (at similar to 210 K) can trigger larger-amplitude fluctuations of protein. The protein-water hydrogen bonds lost about 40% in the total change from 150 K to 210 K, while the Mean Square Displacement increased by little. The protein was activated when the hydration water in local had a comparable trend in making hydrogen bonds with protein- and other waters. The mutations changed the local chemical properties and the hydration exhibited a biphasic distribution, with two time scales. Hydrogen bonding relaxation governed the local protein fluctuations on the picosecond time scale, with the fastest time (24.9 ps) at the hydrophobic site and slowest time (40.4 ps) in the charged environment. The protein dynamic was related to the water's translational diffusion via the relaxation of the protein-water's H-bonding. The structural and dynamical properties of protein-water at the molecular level are fundamental to the physiological and functional mechanisms of SNase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据