4.6 Article

π-π Noncovalent Interaction Involving 1,2,4-and 1,3,4-Oxadiazole Systems: The Combined Experimental, Theoretical, and Database Study

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26185672

关键词

noncovalent interactions; pi center dot center dot center dot pi interactions; oxadiazoles; X-ray diffraction studies; computational studies; databases search

资金

  1. Council for Grants of the President of Russian Federation [MK-1074.2020.3]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [20-73-00038]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [20-73-00038] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of N-pyridyl ureas bearing 1,2,4- and 1,3,4-oxadiazole moieties were synthesized, characterized, and analyzed through crystallography, Hirshfeld surface analysis, DFT calculations, and database surveys to reveal the interactions between these compounds. The study not only confirmed the presence of specific interactions theoretically, but also identified similar examples in other databases, demonstrating the generality of the observed interactions.
A series of N-pyridyl ureas bearing 1,2,4- (1a, 2a, and 3a) and 1,3,4-oxadiazole moiety (1b, 2b, 3b) was prepared and characterized by HRMS, H-1 and C-13 NMR spectroscopy, as well as X-ray diffraction. The inspection of the crystal structures of (1-3)a,b and the Hirshfeld surface analysis made possible the recognition of the (oxadiazole)center dot center dot center dot(pyridine) and (oxadiazole)center dot center dot center dot(oxadiazole) interactions. The presence of these interactions was confirmed theoretically by DFT calculations, including NCI analysis for experimentally determined crystal structures as well as QTAIM analysis for optimized equilibrium structures. The preformed database survey allowed the verification of additional examples of relevant (oxadiazole)center dot center dot center dot pi interactions both in Cambridge Structural Database and in Protein Data Bank, including the cocrystal of commercial anti-HIV drug Raltegravir.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据