4.7 Article

Isomorphous replacement in Fe2O3-NiO/Al2O3 particles and its effect on oxygen carrier performance

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 56-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.02.017

关键词

Iron oxide; Chemical looping; Carbon monoxide; NiO; Isomorphous replacement

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51176062, 51576081]
  2. Research Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [20130142110086]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0226]
  4. Hubei Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [2013CFA036]
  5. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion [FSKLCCB1404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using Fe2O3, Fe2O3/Al2O3, and Fe2O3-NiO/Al2O3 as oxygen carriers (OCs) on chemical looping combustion with CO was investigated in this study. All the modified iron-based OCs were prepared by sol-gel method, and the samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), N-2 adsorption/desorption, and scanning electron microscope/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The temperature-programmed reduction showed that loading on Al2O3 will promote the reduction of Fe2O3 to Fe3O4, but further reduction will be inhibited, and the addition of NiO can effectively reduce this inhibition. Thermogravimetric analysis also revealed that NiO addition can improve the maximum reaction rate of iron-based OCs in the oxidation stage. Mixing with NiO will also decrease the oxygen capacity of iron-based OCs. The XRD data of the reduced samples showed that both Al2O3 and NiO have an isomorphous replacement effect on Fe3O4. The isomorphous replacement effect of NiO is much stronger than that of Al2O3. Thus, NiO introduction can effectively inhibit the formation of FeAl2O4 and promote the further reduction of Fe-oxides to Fe. However, Ni2+ will replace part of the Fe2+ in Fe3O4 to form NiFe2O4 and slightly decrease the oxygen capacity of iron-based OCs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据