4.8 Article

Neurexin 1 variants as risk factors for suicide death

期刊

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
卷 26, 期 12, 页码 7436-7445

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-021-01190-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH [UL1TR002538]
  2. llumina, Inc.
  3. Janssen Research & Development, LLC
  4. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH105426, R01MH099134, R01MH122412, R01MH123489]
  5. Clark Tanner Foundation
  6. Utah Genome Project
  7. Sharon Kae Lehr Endowed Research Fund in Memory of James Raymond Crump
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB1348 TP A03]
  9. IZKF Munster [Mi3-004-19]
  10. HCI Cancer Center Support grant
  11. National Cancer Institute [P30CA42014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Variants in NRXN1 and related synaptic genes are associated with increased familial risk of suicide death, and these variants have an impact on binding interactions with partners. Further study on these variants is warranted as risk factors for suicide death.
Suicide is a significant public health concern with complex etiology. Although the genetic component of suicide is well established, the scope of gene networks and biological mechanisms underlying suicide has yet to be defined. Previously, we reported genome-wide evidence that neurexin 1 (NRXN1), a key synapse organizing molecule, is associated with familial suicide risk. Here we present new evidence for two non-synonymous variants (rs78540316; P469S and rs199784139; H885Y) associated with increased familial risk of suicide death. We tested the impact of these variants on binding interactions with known partners and assessed functionality in a hemi-synapse formation assay. Although the formation of hemi-synapses was not altered with the P469S variant relative to wild-type, both variants increased binding to the postsynaptic binding partner, leucine-rich repeat transmembrane neuronal 2 (LRRTM2) in vitro. Our findings indicate that variants in NRXN1 and related synaptic genes warrant further study as risk factors for suicide death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据