4.5 Review

Chloride intracellular channels as novel biomarkers for digestive system tumors

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2021.12269

关键词

chloride intracellular channels; digestive system tumors; ion channel; chloride; anion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82073087]
  2. Guizhou Provincial Department of Education Youth Science and Technology Talents Growth Project [QIAN-JIAO-HE KY ZI (2018)236]
  3. Zunyi Medical University 2017 New Academic Cultivation and Innovation Exploration Special Project [Qian-Ke-He-Ping-Tai-Ren-Cai (2017)5733-072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chloride channels play a crucial role in the development of multiple types of cancers, potentially serving as important targets for the diagnosis and treatment of digestive system tumors.
Digestive system malignant tumors are common tumors, and the traditional treatment methods for these tumors include surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and molecularly targeted drugs. However, diagnosis remains challenging, and the early detection of postoperative recurrence is complicated. Therefore, it is necessary to explore novel biomarkers to facilitate clinical diagnosis and treatment. Accumulating evidence supports the crucial role of chloride channels in the development of multiple types of cancers. Given that chloride channels are widely expressed and involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle, among other processes, they may serve as a promising diagnostic and therapeutic target. Chloride intracellular channels (CLICs) are a class of chloride channels that are upregulated or downregulated in certain types of cancer. Furthermore, in certain cases, during cell cycle progression, the localization and function of the cytosolic form of the transmembrane proteins of CLICs are also altered, which may provide a key target for cancer therapy. The aim of the present review was to focus on CLICs as biomarkers for digestive system tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据