4.5 Review

Evaluation of the target-specific therapeutic potential of herbal compounds for the treatment of cancer

期刊

MOLECULAR DIVERSITY
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 1823-1835

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11030-021-10271-x

关键词

Phytochemicals; Drug targets; Anticancer; Synergic effect; Therapeutics

资金

  1. DSTFIST [SR/FST/LS- I/2018/131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer is a fatal disease with chemotherapy being a popular treatment approach, but it comes with various side effects and puts patients under extreme stress. Plant-derived compounds are being explored as alternative treatments due to their potential in providing safer and more efficient options for cancer therapy.
Cancer is among one of the most fatal diseases leading to millions of death around the globe. Chemotherapy is the most popular conventional approach for the treatment of cancer. However, this is usually associated with various side effects and puts the patients under extreme physical and mental stress. Besides, there are increasing concerns about drug resistance. Thus, to surmount these limitations, there is a need to explore some alternative treatments. Studies related to plant-derived compounds are crucial in the search for safer and more efficient treatments. Plants and their associated secondary metabolites have been a revolutionary approach in the field of cancer treatment, as they give answers to almost all the constraints faced by synthetic drugs. Various plants and associated secondary metabolites display a great prospective as cytotoxic anticancer agents due to their specific interference with validated drug targets, such as inhibitors of mitosis, topoisomerase I and II inhibitor, DNA interactive agent, protein kinase inhibitors, inhibitors of DNA synthesis. In this review, the therapeutic potential of various natural compounds and their derivatives are presented based on their molecular targets. These herbal compounds and their derivatives could provide a rich resource for novel anticancer drug development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据