4.6 Article

Development and characterization of novel Triticum aestivum-Agropyron cristatum 6P Robertsonian translocation lines

期刊

MOLECULAR BREEDING
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-021-01251-y

关键词

Common wheat; Agropyron cristatum; Wide hybridization; Robertsonian translocation; Grain weight

资金

  1. Science and Technology Innovation Project of CAAS [01-ICS-03]
  2. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agropyron cristatum, an important wild relative of wheat, may carry genes for increased grain weight and width on its 6P chromosome. The development of Robertsonian translocation lines could promote the utilization of the 6P chromosome of Agropyron cristatum in wheat improvement.
Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. (2n = 4x = 28, PPPP), one of the most important wild relatives of wheat, harbors many desirable genes for wheat genetic improvement. Development of wheat-A. cristatum translocation lines with superior agronomic traits facilitates wheat genetic improvement. In this study, 5106-DS was identified to be a wheat-A. cristatum 6P (6D) disomic substitution line using cytogenetic identification and molecular markers analysis, which displayed higher thousand-grain weight than its wheat parent Triticum aestivum cv. Fukuhokomugi (2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD). Analysis of its backcross populations indicated that there might be genes conferring increased grain weight and width on the chromosome 6P of 5106-DS. In the backcross population, we found three plants as Robertsonian translocation lines, created by chromosome centric breakage-fusion. Among them, there are one T6DS center dot 6PL and two T6PS center dot 6DL Robertsonian translocation lines. Additionally, the centromeres of these three translocation lines were determined to be fused centromeres of 6D and 6P using the probes pAcCR1 and pCCS1. The development of Robertsonian translocation lines would promote the utilization of A. cristatum chromosome 6P in wheat improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据