4.7 Article

Efficient utilization of associated natural gas in a modular gas-to-liquids process: Technical and economic analysis

期刊

FUEL
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 32-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.060

关键词

Greenhouse gas; CO2 utilization; Gas-to-liquids; Microchannel F-T synthesis; Process modeling; Economic analysis

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) under Energy Efficiency & Resources Programs of the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20132010201781]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20132010201781] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two process models for modular gas-to-liquids (GTL) process mainly producing Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) synthetic oils were developed by Aspen Plus software. Both models mainly comprised a reforming unit, an F-T synthesis unit, and a recycle unit, with the syngas generation and syngas ratio conditioning methods as the main difference. In the reforming unit, either steam reforming or CO2/Steam-mixed reforming was selected to generate the desired syngas. Co-based microchannel F-T synthesis was applied to convert the obtained syngas to synthetic oils. After F-T synthesis, a portion of the unreacted syngas was recycled to improve energy efficiency, and reduce CO2 emissions. Technical and economic analyses were both employed to investigate the two modular GTL options. For the technical aspect, effects of recycling and splitting ratios on the performance of both options were investigated. Sensitivity analysis and break-even analysis were applied to the economic analysis. It was found that the increased energy efficiency and reduced CO2 emissions could be achieved by recycling a portion of the unreacted syngas. Both options were economically viable at the plant scale of 2500 BPD, and were more competitive in the event of high carbon tax. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据