4.6 Article

Deep-learning based classification distinguishes sarcomatoid malignant mesotheliomas from benign spindle cell mesothelial proliferations

期刊

MODERN PATHOLOGY
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 2028-2035

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00850-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of British Columbia Dept of Pathology Residency Training Program
  2. Dermatology Point-of-Care Intelligent Network, a Digital Technology Supercluster project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SpindleMesoNET, a deep learning classifier, accurately distinguishes sarcomatoid mesothelioma from benign spindle cell mesothelial proliferations with high predictive performance, showing potential as an ancillary tool in diagnostic pathology.
Sarcomatoid mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy that can be challenging to distinguish from benign spindle cell mesothelial proliferations based on biopsy, and this distinction is crucial to patient treatment and prognosis. A novel deep learning based classifier may be able to aid pathologists in making this critical diagnostic distinction. SpindleMesoNET was trained on cases of malignant sarcomatoid mesothelioma and benign spindle cell mesothelial proliferations. Performance was assessed through cross-validation on the training set, on an independent set of challenging cases referred for expert opinion ('referral' test set), and on an externally stained set from outside institutions ('externally stained' test set). SpindleMesoNET predicted the benign or malignant status of cases with AUC's of 0.932, 0.925, and 0.989 on the cross-validation, referral and external test sets, respectively. The accuracy of SpindleMesoNET on the referral set cases (92.5%) was comparable to the average accuracy of 3 experienced pathologists on the same slide set (91.7%). We conclude that SpindleMesoNET can accurately distinguish sarcomatoid mesothelioma from benign spindle cell mesothelial proliferations. A deep learning system of this type holds potential for future use as an ancillary test in diagnostic pathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据