4.7 Article

Investigating the performance of oxalic acid for separating bastnaesite from calcium-bearing gangue minerals based on experiment and theoretical calculation

期刊

MINERALS ENGINEERING
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107047

关键词

Bastnaesite; Calcium-bearing gangue minerals; Oxalic acid; Flotation; Adsorption

资金

  1. Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Mineral Processing [BGRIMM-KJSKL-2020-16]
  2. Project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Land and Resources [KJ-2018-08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The selective inhibition mechanism of oxalic acid on common calcium-bearing gangue minerals in bastnaesite flotation was studied, showing that oxalic acid competes with H205 for the active site on the surface of the gangue minerals, reducing their surface hydrophobicity and inhibiting their floating. In this process, fluorite is more inhibited than calcite.
Bastnaesite is a major light rare earth resource in the earth, which is difficult to separate from calcium-bearing gangue minerals in flotation because of their similar flotation characteristics as the semisoluble salt minerals. To address this problem, in 3-hydroxy-2-naphthyl hydroxamic acid (H205) system, the selective inhibition mechanism of oxalic acid on common calcium-bearing gangue minerals (calcite and fluorite) in bastnaesite flotation was studied by flotation tests, solution chemistry analysis, zeta potential measurements, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements, combined with thermodynamics and density functional theory (DFT) calculation. After the analysis of those tests and calculation results, it can be known that the hydrophilic oxalic acid can selectively compete with H205 for the active site (Ca2+) on the surface of the calcium-bearing gangue minerals, thus reducing its surface hydrophobicity and inhibiting its floating, while bastnaesite is not susceptible. In this process, fluorite is more inhibited than calcite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据