4.7 Article

Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas by recyclable CuCl2 modified magnetospheres catalyst from fly ash. Part 1. Catalyst characterization and performance evaluation

期刊

FUEL
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 419-428

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.012

关键词

Mercury; Oxidation; Adsorption; Copper chloride; Magnetospheres

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program (973) of China [2014CB238904]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51176060, 51376074, 51206192]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To remove Hg-0 from coal combustion flue gas and eliminate secondary pollution of spent sorbent, a novel magnetic catalyst based on CuCl2 modified magnetospheres from fly ash (CuCl2-MF) was developed. The solubility tests, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and physical property measurement system with vibrating sample magnetometer (PPMS-VSM) were employed to characterize the catalyst. The effects of CuCl2 loading value and reaction temperature on Hg-0 removal performance were studied using a laboratory-scale fixed-bed reactor. The results suggested that the CuCl2 loaded on the support is present mostly in an amorphous phase. Different copper coordinations are existed in the catalyst with different Cu loading: at low Cu loading, isolated Cu2+ ions existed in a chlorine-free coordination; at high Cu loading, associated Cu2+ ions existed in a chlorine-enriched coordination. The catalyst with optimal loading 6% CuCl2 attained the highest Hg-0 removal efficiency (90.6%) at 150 degrees C. The chlorine-enriched coordination acted as the active adsorption sites for Hg0, while the chlorine-free coordination is inactive for Hg-0 removal. The CuCl2-MF catalyst showed good resistance to SO2 for Hg-0 removal in the presence of HCl. Further, the management method for spent catalyst containing mercury was proposed, and the economic analysis of the technology was also conducted. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据