4.7 Article

A structured Cu-based/γ-Al2O3/Al plate-type catalyst for steam reforming of dimethyl ether: Self-activation behavior investigation and stability improvement

期刊

FUEL
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 11-19

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.036

关键词

Anodic alumina; Dimethyl ether; Steam reforming; Self-activation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20906023]
  2. Shanghai Rising-Star Program (B type) [13QB1401300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A plate-type anodic alumina supported Cu composition catalyst was developed to investigate its catalytic performance in steam reforming of dimethyl ether (DME). It is found that the fresh Cu/gamma-Al2O3/Al catalyst without H-2 pre-reduction treatment exhibited the similar catalytic activity as the pre-reduced one. The XPS results show that Cu+ species exist in the surface of the fresh catalyst, which results in the self activation reaction. However, the Cu/gamma-Al2O3/Al catalyst showed a quick deactivation at 350 degrees C due to the sintering of copper. As an approach, a second component Ni was doped to the Cu-based catalyst, and a series of Cu/Ni/gamma-Al2O3/Al catalysts with different Ni loadings were prepared by impregnation method. Furthermore, the effect of nickel loading and chemical state on the activity of catalyst was extensively investigated. The results show that the catalytic performance was related to both of the nickel loading and chemical state. The proper amount of nickel doping is helpful in improving the dispersion of copper species, and thus enhancing the catalytic activity. Finally, a 180 h stability evaluation was carried out and the results show that the optimized Cu/Ni/gamma-Al2O3/Al catalyst has an excellent stability under critical conditions with 400 degrees C, and gives a 100% DME conversion, which demonstrated that the novel gamma-Al2O3/Al monolith supported Cu and Ni composite catalyst was an excellent catalyst for steam reforming of dimethyl ether. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据