4.7 Article

Rheological comparison of light and heavy crude oils

期刊

FUEL
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 157-167

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.072

关键词

Heavy crude oil; Light crude oil; Rheology; Viscosity; Yield stress; Paraffin wax content; Oil mixtures

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [15-19-00072]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [15-19-00072] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comparative study of the rheological properties for typical heavy and light crude oils of Russian origin and their mixtures was carried out. The chemical composition of both species was characterized by liquid chromatography and gas chromatography mass spectrometry. The light oil is a viscoelastic non Newtonian fluid due to the presence of paraffin waxes; their concentration and the melt temperature were determined by the DSC method. The presence of crystallizable waxes provides viscoelasticity and the appearance of yield stress. Above 28 degrees C, the light oil transforms to a non-elastic Newtonian fluid. The heavy oil demonstrates Newtonian behavior even when cooled to -30 degrees C. However, the heavy oil becomes viscoelastic at temperatures below 0 degrees C, which does not indicate waxes, but rather the presence of high molecular-weight components. The temperature dependence of the viscosity of the heavy oil is well fitted by the WLF equation. The viscosity of the heavy oil is higher than the light oil above the melt temperature of paraffin waxes and vice versa. In the heavy-light oil mixtures, the melt temperature decreases and the yield stress diminishes due to the decrease in wax content. At the same time, a decrease of the high molecular-weight asphaltenes and resins fraction in mixtures results in a decreased viscosity at high temperatures and high shear rates. The optimal composition of mixtures is 1/3 (light/heavy), which provides the decrease of viscosity and suppression of yield stress. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据