4.7 Article

Effects of montmorillonite and anatase TiO2 support on CeO2 catalysts during NH3-SCR reaction

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111072

关键词

NH3-SCR; xCe-Ti/Mt; Anatase TiO2; Catalytic activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676288]
  2. QIBEBT [QIBEBT ZZBS 201805]
  3. Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy (DNL) Cooperation Fund, CAS [DNL 180406]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel hybrid catalyst (xCe-Ti/Mt) with excellent catalytic activity for NH3-SCR reaction was prepared, and characterization results showed that the integration of montmorillonite and anatase TiO2 significantly enhanced the catalyst's surface acidity and redox properties, leading to improved catalytic performance. The impact of Ce concentration on the NH3-SCR reaction was also explored, with the 6Ce-Ti/Mt catalyst exhibiting the highest activity among the samples.
Cerium supported on titanium oxides are regarded as the most potential alternative catalysts for removing NOx by selective catalytic reduction. However, their poor catalytic activity in low and high temperature range seriously limit their practical applications. Herein, a series of hybrid catalysts (xCe-Ti/Mt) combining certain amount of CeO2 supported on montmorillonite (Mt) and anatase TiO2 were prepared by sol-gel method for NH3-SCR reaction. xCe-Ti/Mt showed excellent catalytic activity in the temperature range of 275 degrees C-450 degrees C. The catalysts were studied by XRD, SEM, BET, XPS, H-2-TPR and NH3-TPD techniques. The characterization results verified that the integration of montmorillonite and anatase TiO2 can obviously increase the surface acidity, H-2 consumption, the ratio of chemisorbed oxygen O alpha/(O alpha+O beta) and Ce3+/(Ce3++ Ce4+). These were believed to be the causes that promote the NH3-SCR performance of the samples. The effect of Ce concentration on the NH3-SCR reaction was also explored, the catalyst of 6Ce-Ti/Mt exhibited the best catalytic activity over the samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据